Open Letter from the Committee on Fair Elections

Bylaws & Rules Violated in KPFA Board Election of 2007


KPFA's recent Local Station Board (LSB) election was not the example of media democracy it was designed to be. This LSB election:

  • Was not conducted in conformance with the Pacifica Bylaws;
  • Was corrupted by KPFA and Pacifica management and some staff intentionally violating rules to get votes for their allies' slate;
  • Did not provide adequate information about the candidates to enable voters to make educated choices;
  • Did not provide ballots to many eligible voters in a timely manner.

New bylaws were adopted after the 1999 "hijacking" attempt was defeated by mass listener activity to protect and preserve KPFA and Pacifica. These Bylaws incorporated fair elections of governing boards for each station to eliminate the prior practice of self-appointing boards, which led to the crisis in the 1990s.

Every subscriber and staffer, whatever their views on the issues and candidates, has a right to expect that the process by which we select our governing board will be fair, open, and orderly, in accordance with the Fair Campaign Provisions established by Pacifica's bylaws and election supervisors; that the information voters need to make an informed choice will be available in a timely way; and that all candidates will be afforded an equal opportunity to present their views and their qualifications to the voters.

In reality, the process has fallen far short of these standards:


Management influence and improper use of station resources:

The 2007 Fair Campaign Provisions, which every staff member, including managers, was required to read and sign, state that "No Foundation or radio station management or staff (paid or unpaid) or any other person may use or permit the use of radio station air time, website space, email lists, or other resources to endorse, campaign for or against, promote or disparage, or recommend in favor of or against any candidate for election as a Local Station Board." Yet on October 24, just over a week after ballots were mailed to listener-sponsors, KPFA and the other Pacifica stations posted on their websites an open letter from Dan Siegel, then Interim Executive Director of the Pacifica Foundation, with the admitted objective of influencing voters' choices: the letter directly disparaged one easily identifiable group of KPFA candidates, denouncing their strongly stated but clearly political free speech criticisms of some station personnel and management-allied LSB members, as "abusive," "hateful," "personal attacks." This letter remained prominently featured on the KPFA website for more than a week, and was never removed from the National Elections Web page, to which KPFA's was linked.

Siegel's was not the only serious violation of the Fair Campaign Provision quoted above. On October 30 veteran programmer Larry Bensky used a KPFA e-mail list and server to send out to an as yet unknown number of voters a message endorsing one slate of candidates and attacking the incumbent board.


Defiance of supervisors' authority:

In the event of any violation of the Fair Campaign Provisions, the Pacifica bylaws say "the local elections supervisor and the national elections supervisor shall determine, in good faith and at their sole discretion, an appropriate remedy." In response to Bensky's blatant violation of the rules, the election supervisors devised a partial remedy, instructing station management to allow each competing slate to send a 300-word message of their own to the same e-mail list Bensky used. The slates promptly produced their proposed messages, but KPFA's managers simply stonewalled, refusing to take the steps necessary to get these messages sent out on the list. As the national election supervisor eventually ruled - after the ballot deadline - this refusal to comply with the election supervisors' order amounted to nothing less than "obstruction of the governance of the foundation."


Inadequate information:

Without understanding of the issues at stake in LSB elections or of the views of the candidates, listener-sponsors can't make meaningful choices. The candidate statements mailed to listeners-subscribers with their ballots go only a small part of the way toward meeting this need; on-air candidate forums and announcements and in-person events are also essential for informing the electorate. After past elections, there have been both widespread sentiment and reports by election supervisors calling for more such events and publicity, but this year KPFA had less than ever before.

Only one two-part on-air forum was held before ballots were mailed to listener-subscribers, but it was poorly publicized in advance, and afterwards the audio archives were not posted at the station website for weeks. Candidates were required to respond to a detailed questionnaire about their views and experience, but their responses were not posted online until the voting period was almost over. Candidate statements were posted briefly, but then removed from the web for much of the voting period. During the fall fund drive, which ran from Oct. 16 to Nov. 2, the station provided no information whatsoever about the election, on the dubious grounds that election information can't be combined with fund-raising. KPFT in Houston does both. Even after the drive ended, station management did not begin airing candidates' pre-recorded statements until less than a week remained in the voting period, and then there was no transparent system to ensure all candidates' carts got equal treatment. Management even tried to satisfy its obligation to air the carts by playing them all in a bloc -21 in a row - an approach guaranteed to minimize listenership, and one that was particularly unfair to the candidates whose statements were aired last. The management-allied slate's number-one candidate had her statement played first on the list of 21. Only one in-person candidate event was organized, in Berkeley, and it received very little publicity over the air.

The black-out of election information during the fund drive was especially damaging: it left voters with minimal information when they first received their ballots, thus magnifying the advantage of the KPFA management-backed, "Concerned Listeners" slate, that spent thousands of dollars to send its own carefully-timed mailing to arrive with the ballots during the black-out.


Failure to provide ballots to all eligible voters:

While, as in past elections, many listener-sponsors reported not receiving ballot packets, the problem is - still - particularly acute among volunteers voting in the staff elections, because management failed in its duty to provide a timely, accurate, and complete list of the unpaid staff. As recently as Nov. 29, after the elections should have been closed, more than 40 unpaid staff members had not received a ballot; on the other hand, members of management, who were not entitled to vote at all, did receive ballots. The election supervisors have had to extend the election deadline several times, but it still appears that many eligible staffers will not receive ballots before the election finally closes.

KPFA and Pacifica listeners fought hard for the right to elect their governing boards, and for good reasons: to prevent a recurrence of the kind of takeover that occurred in the 1990s; to give the listeners whose support keeps the station and network afloat a way to shape their direction; and to demonstrate that communities can govern themselves. All these reasons remain valid today. We are deeply dismayed that some powerful elements within the KPFA community have shown themselves willing to subvert our hard-won bylaws and abandon basic principles of fairness and democracy.

If you would like to support fair elections at KPFA/Pacifica send contact information to Committee for Fair Elections at fair_elections(at)yahoo.com.


Fair Election Committee Endorsers: (in progress)

Richard Phelps**, Henry Norr, Stan Woods, Akio Tanaka, Noelle Hanrahan, Joe Wanzala, Attila Nagy, LaVarn Williams*, Chandra Hauptman * **, Anthony Fest Current Board Members {*also PNB; ** Reelected in preliminary (uncertified) results}

Carol Spooner, Steve Conley. Gerald Sanders, Sepideh Khosrowjah, Willie Ratcliff, Maria Gilardin Former Board Members;

Tracy Rosenberg**, KPFA Local Election Supervisor 2006 & Board Candidate;

Bob English, Dave Heller, Mara Rivera, Steve Zeltzer, Carl Bryant, CC Campbell Rock, 2007 Board Candidates; Tim Modok-Pearson 2003 Board Candidate;

Linda Hewitt, Virginia Browning, Daniel Borgström, Steve Gilmartin, Gregory Wonderwheel, Jim Curtis, Adrienne Lauby, Stephen Kessler, Molly Beyea, Janet Kobren, Chuck O'Neil, CR (Bob) Briscoe, Ann Garrison, Rabea Chaudhary, Dianne Budd, Laura Wells, Karen Engel, Mary Ratcliff, Lou Gold, Peter Broadwell, David Keenan, Bill Carpenter, Barbara Deutsch, Barry Deutsch, Steve Morse, Mishwa Lee, Barbara Ruth, J.T. Rehbock, Vic Saravia, Tony Brasunas, Margaret Browne, Tony Sustak, Michael S. Donaldson, Mark Boynton, Lucienne O'Keefe, Bill Michel listener members





*** *** ***
*** *** ***

for updates, reports & essays on KPFA/Pacifica,
please visit these websites:

UNITED FOR COMMUNITY RADIO

PACIFICA IN EXILE

ANN GARRISON, A KPFA REPORTER

LORDS & LADIES vs. the PEASANTS at KPFA


*** *** ***

KPFA 94.1 FM is one of five stations of the Pacifica radio network which are located in major cities across the country. The other stations are WBAI 99.5 in New York, WPFW 89.3 in Washington DC, KPFT 90.1 in Houston, and KPFK 90.7 in Los Angeles. There are also about 160 affiliate stations.




Vote for the UCR -- United for Community Radio













Labels: , ,

Between the Minutes

BETWEEN THE MINUTES: A LEGAL SESSION AT THE LSB
Notes from KPFA's board Mtg of March 24, 2007 at Café de la Paz
by Daniel Borgström

KPFA's board meeting of March 24th was mostly devoted to special presentations by HR Director Yolanda Thomas and Pacifica Legal Counsel Dan Siegel. Q&A sessions followed, during which two previously unresolved legal questions were brought up for discussion: The first related to the disciplining of a board member who had purchased an airline ticket at Pacifica expense without authorization. The second was the legality of a directive issued by KPFA's IPD (Interim Program Director) Sasha Lilley.

Yolanda Thomas made her presentation first, explaining her duties as HR Director, which include assisting in the hirings of general manager and program director, as well as the handling of other personnel issues. There were questions and comments from several LSB members, including two significant matters brought up by Sasha Futran and Noelle Hanrahan.

Sasha Futran brought up a confidentiality issue: someone had posted her résumé on a public website last fall in an attempt to discredit her during the LSB election. That could only have been done by someone with access to KPFA/Pacifica records, and the act constituted a violation of confidentiality. Sasha was elected in spite of the attack.

Noelle Hanrahan told about her lawsuit against KPFA, which she said cost the station around $450 thousand, including $258 thousand for her and her lawyer. The suit had been her only option, she said, because of the dysfunctionality of a management that was unable to deal with such problems. KPFA/Pacifica needs a more appropriate policy to handle matters like this, Noelle emphasized. Otherwise, costly legal actions were likely to happen again, and cost the station more money in lawsuits.

After the HR Director's presentation, Pacifica Legal Counsel Dan Siegel spoke about the duties and limitations of the LSB. He explained various issues such as conflict of interest as it might relate to board members.

During Q&A, Attorney Siegel was asked general questions about disciplining LSB members. Many of the questions concerned the matter of confidentiality, or the lack of it, in such a process. Should it be dealt with in closed session, and should names and facts be released to the listener public?

Questions, comments and assertions flew back and forth across the room. Some said it was a personnel issue, therefore confidential, so the case should be resolved in closed session. Others took a different view, maintaining that board members are NOT employees. LSB member Richard Phelps pointed out that Pacifica Bylaw Article 6, Section 7 stipulates that all board meetings are open to the listeners except for those sessions dealing with items on a specified list, and board member discipline is not on that list.

"We're a political body," said board member Phelps. "We stand for election. Therefore it's an issue of transparency."

This discussion on discipline referred to a matter which had come to light during the previous meeting, concerning the purchase of an airline ticket by a board member at Pacifica expense. Of course neither the offense nor the offender was named at this time. The ticket purchaser sat knitting a shawl, but asked no questions. The 30 days allowed to her by the bylaws to prepare her response has now expired, and the matter is expected to come up on Saturday, April 28th. There will probably also be a struggle over whether or not to hide the process in executive session.

Sasha Lilley is KPFA's Interim Program Director, and on March 16th she issued a directive to programmers, warning them NOT to "actively urge listeners to attend events over KPFA's airwaves because of issues of liability." However, there seemed to be no liability issue. Then someone (on Indybay, where it was discussed in detail) said it was in order to comply with FCC rules. But the FCC rules didn't seem to apply either.

It was LSB member Henry Norr who raised this question, asking Attorney Dan Siegel if there were any FCC regulation which prohibited programmers from encouraging listeners to attend demonstrations. Siegel replied that no such law exists.

Almost everyone on the board had some question or comment on the directive. It became the hot topic of the afternoon, and Counsel Siegel demolished any pretense of logic behind the IPD's directive.

Siegel explained that KPFA is a non-profit organization, a "501 C 3". It cannot endorse candidates. However, its very purpose as an organization is to promote peace. That's what KPFA exists for.

LSB member Bonnie Simmons informed Siegel that KPFA had been sued by someone who was injured at a demonstration.

"When was that?" Dan Siegel wanted to know, and asked for the specifics. But nobody was able to present any case where KPFA or any other station was sued just for urging attendance at a peace rally.

"Sounds like urban legend," concluded Attorney Siegel.

During all of this, Sasha Lilley sat in the back of the room, a couple of rows behind me. She certainly must've heard everything that was said. Nevertheless, instead of withdrawing her ill-starred directive, she defended it during the management report to the listeners on KPFA on April 2nd, after all the legal opinions were in. She has also written an article in the Berkeley Daily Planet to defend it.

Three experienced lawyers have taken her directive apart, demolishing it in detail. These attorneys are: the above Dan Siegel, Pacifica Legal Counsel, Richard Phelps, LSB member and John Crigler, Pacifica's FCC Counsel.

Labels: , , ,